DNA vaccination against persistent viral infection

LP Martins, LL Lau, MS Asano, R Ahmed - Journal of Virology, 1995 - Am Soc Microbiol
LP Martins, LL Lau, MS Asano, R Ahmed
Journal of Virology, 1995Am Soc Microbiol
This study shows that DNA vaccination can confer protection against a persistent viral
infection by priming CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL). Adult BALB/c (H-2d) mice were
injected intramuscularly with a plasmid expressing the nucleoprotein (NP) gene of
lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV) under the control of the cytomegalovirus
promoter. The LCMV NP contains the immunodominant CTL epitope (amino acids 118 to
126) recognized by mice of the H-2d haplotype. After three injections with 200 micrograms of …
This study shows that DNA vaccination can confer protection against a persistent viral infection by priming CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL). Adult BALB/c (H-2d) mice were injected intramuscularly with a plasmid expressing the nucleoprotein (NP) gene of lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV) under the control of the cytomegalovirus promoter. The LCMV NP contains the immunodominant CTL epitope (amino acids 118 to 126) recognized by mice of the H-2d haplotype. After three injections with 200 micrograms of NP DNA, the vaccinated mice were challenged with LCMV variants (clones 13 and 28b) that establish persistent infection in naive adult mice. Fifty percent of the DNA-vaccinated mice were protected, as evidenced by decreased levels of infectious virus in the blood and tissues, eventual clearance of viral antigen from all organs tested, the presence of an enhanced LCMV-specific CD8+ CTL response, and maintenance of memory CTL after clearance of virus infection. However, it should be noted that protection was seen in only half of the vaccinated mice, and we were unable to directly measure virus-specific immune responses in any of the DNA-vaccinated mice prior to LCMV challenge. Thus, at least in the system that we have used, gene immunization was a suboptimal method of inducing protective immunity and was several orders of magnitude less efficient than vaccination with live virus. In conclusion, our results show that DNA immunization works against a persistent viral infection but that efforts should be directed towards improving this novel method of vaccination.
American Society for Microbiology